ترکیب‌ درون‌مرکز غیرفعلی در لکی الشتری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دانشیار زبان‌شناسی، زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

3 استادیار زبان‌شناسی همگانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران

چکیده

پرتکرارترین ساختارهایی که در ترکیب‌های درون‌مرکز غیرفعلی در زبان لکی یافت می‌شوند عبارت‌اند از: [اسم + اسم]، [اسم + صفت] و [صفت + اسم]. علاوه‌بر اینها، سه ساختار کم‌بسامدتر [اسم + حرف اضافه]، [حرف اضافه + اسم] و [عدد + اسم] نیز در این زبان یافت می‌شود. تحلیل معنایی این ساختارها نشان می‌دهد که برحسب نوع رابطۀ بین اجزای سازندۀ ترکیب، معانی متنوعی از آنها استنباط می‌شود و تنوع معنایی ترکیب‌های [اسم + اسم] بیش از سایر ترکیب‌های درون‌مرکز است. ترکیب‌های درون‌مرکز [اسم + اسم] به دو زیرطبقۀ هسته‌آغاز و هسته‌پایان تقسیم می‌شوند و در آنها مفاهیم متعددی را می‌توان یافت که عبارت‌اند از: منشأ، محتوا، کاربرد، شباهت، جنس، محل، وابستگی، آغشتگی، زمان، اختصاص، نوع، تغذیه، شیوه و هدف. ترکیب‌های درون‌مرکز [اسم + صفت] نیز از لحاظ معنایی تنوع قابل توجهی دارند و معانی متعددی شامل نحوۀ عملکرد، ابزار تولید، محتوا، نسبت، خصوصیت و ارتباط خاص در این نوع ترکیب‌ها یافت می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Non-verbal Endocentric Compounds in Alashtari Laki

نویسندگان [English]

  • Faranak Naderi 1
  • Ebrahim Badakhshan 2
  • Akram Korani 3
1 PhD student in Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Iran
2 Associate Professor of General Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of General Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present article aims to investigate the non-verbal endocentric compounds in Laki language. The research data include endocentric compounds collected from two sources: the daily speech of Laki speakers by the researcher and the two-volume book of ‘Laki Dictionary’ (Kiyani Kolivand, 2011). The results of the research show that the most frequent structures of non-verbal endocentric compounds in Laki include [noun + noun], [noun + adjective] and [adjective + noun]. In addition to these structures, there are three subsidiary low frequency structures in this language: [noun + preposition], [preposition + noun] and [number + noun]. The semantic analysis of the structures above shows that the diversity of relations between components of compounds results in various interpretations, among which the semantic diversity of [noun + noun] compounds is by far more than other endocentric compounds. The [noun + noun] endocentric compounds are classified into two categories, head-initial and head-final, in which numerous concepts are found: source, content, usage, similarity, material, place, dependency, amalgamation, time, specialty, type, nutrition, manner, and purpose. The [noun + adjective] endocentric compounds also have considerable semantic diversity and different meanings are found, including performance, an instrument of production, content, relation, features, and special relationship.

1.Introduction

Compounding is one of the main word-formation processes found in most languages ​​of the world.  In this process, two words are mixed together and a compound word is formed, which can have considerable variety in terms of components and meaning. Compounding has different types, and one of the most important types is the endocentric compound, which has a semantic head, and the whole meaning of the inclusive compounding is the meaning of its head. The aim of the recent research is to investigate the nonverbal endocentric compounds in the Alshtari species of the Laki language. Laki language belongs to the northwest branch of Iranian languages, which is spoken in the northern and northwestern regions of Lorestan province, in parts of Khorramabad, as well as in parts of Kermanshah, Ilam and Hamedan provinces (Dabir -Moghaddam, 2014: 862). Laki language has several varieties one of which is common in Alshtar city, the center of Selseleh city in Lorestan province known as Laki Alshtari. Nonverbal endocentric compounds refer to those endocentric compounds that do not have a verbal stem in their structure.
 

2.Theoretical framework

Adams (2001) deals with the semantic classification of compounds, especially the compounds [noun + noun] in English.  He offers the following classification of endocentric nouns (2001: 83-84).
Usage: ignition key
Function: air gun
Location: amusement park
Origin: field mouse
Cause 1: influenza virus
Cause 2: sex discrimination
Source: honey bee
Possession: minority rights
Content: fruit cake
Resemblance: box kite
 

3.Methodology

Research data include endocentric compound words obtained from two sources, one is the everyday speech of Laki speakers in the family, workplace and community around the researcher and the other is the two-volume book "Laki Culture and Glossary" (Kiani Kolivand, 2011).  Since one of the present authors speaks Laki she also used his linguistic intuition to validate the data.  The present research is conducted within the framework of Adams (2001) and its main questions are: 1) What are the endocentric compounds of the Laki language in terms of morphological structure?  2) What are the semantic relationships between the components of these compounds?
 

4.Results & Discussions

The analysis of endocentric compound words in Laki language shows that these types of compounds are structurally and semantically very diverse and they can be structurally divided into three main categories [noun + noun], [noun + adjective] and [adjective + noun]. In addition to these structures, three other structures including [preposition + noun], [noun + preposition] and [number + noun] can also be seen in this type of compounds. The nature of the relationship between the components of the compounds leads to the emergence of a range of meanings in them, and based on this semantic relationship, endocentric compounds can be classified. The findings of the recent research indicate that the semantic diversity of [noun + noun] compounds is far greater than other endocentric compounds.  Endocentric compounds [noun + noun] are divided into two subcategories, the headfirst and the head last, and are found several concepts within them namely: origin, content, application, similarity, sex, place, dependence, impregnation, time, allocation, type, nutrition, method and purpose.  The internal structure [noun + adjective] is also semantically varied, and several meanings including mode of operation, means of production, content, ratio, specificity and specific relation, can be found in these combinations.  Some of these semantic relationships have not been found in previous related research on languages ​​such as English and German. Also, the presence of the structures like [preposition + preposition], [noun + preposition] and [number + noun] although at very low frequencies, indicates that the endocentric compounds of Laki is also structurally varied and that structures in this Language can be found in fewer languages.
 

5.Conclusions & Suggestions

One of the important results of the present research is that some semantic relationships that have been identified between the components of the compound [noun + noun] in Laki language have not been found in the study of Adams (2001) and Costello and Kane (2000). These semantic relationships include allocation, component, method, time, nutrition, and impregnation. In Laki [noun + adjective] compounds, some semantic relationships such as mode of operation, production tools and contents have been obtained which have not been mentioned in the few researches done on this type of compounds such as Appah (2016).  In this regard, it can be said that the present study has taken a small step towards completing and expanding the semantic classification of nonverbal endocentric compounds.  The results of this study show that some of the semantic classifications proposed for noun-noun compounds, such as the Castello and Kane (2000) classifications, are very general and cannot represent the detailed semantic relationships between the components of the compound. Therefore, the semantic diversity of endocentric compounds, noun-noun compounds in Laki, which is the result of the various semantic relationships between the components of these compounds, cannot be analyzed within the framework of this classification. Because most of these relationships, such as origin, content, application, type, assignment, time, etc., fall into the category of "relationship" interpretation, and as a result, conceptual differences between them remain unknown.
 
Select Bibliography
Adams, V. 1973. An introduction to modern English word formation. London: Longman.
Adams, V. 2001. Complex words in English. Harlow: Pearson.
Appah, C.K.I. 2016. Noun-adjective compounds in akan. Lingue e linguaggio, XV(2), 259-284.
Assi, m. & Badakhshan, E., 2010. Classification of Compound words, Persian language and literature Quarterly, PP. 71-94. [in Persian]
Azadpour, R.  2013. Laki dialect: phonology, grammar, vocabulary.  Qom: Noor Publishing House. [in Persian]
Azizi, Z.  2015. Investigation of word formation processes in Laki dialect based on reproductive theory.  Master Thesis in Linguistics, Kurdistan University, Sanandaj. [in Persian]
Bauer, L. 2017. Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benczes, R. 2006. Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bisetto, A. & Scalise, S. 2005. The Classification of Compounds. Lingue E Linguaggio, 4(2), 319-332.
Kiani Kolivand, K.  2011. Laki Culture and Dictionary (Kian Culture).  Two volumes.  Khorramabad: Sifa Publications. [in Persian]
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Compounding
  • Endocentric compound
  • Word formation
  • Compound word
  • Laki language
آزادپور، ر. 1392. گویش لکی: آواشناسی، دستور، واژگان. قم: نگاران نور.
ترابیان، ا. 1392. بررسی استعاره در اسم‌های مرکب اسم-اسم زبان فارسی در چارچوب زبان‌شناسی شناختی. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز.
خباز، م. 1385. ترکیب غیرفعلی در زبان فارسی. رسالۀ دکتری زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
خباز، م. 1386. «جایگاه هسته در کلمات مرکب غیرفعلی فارسی». دستور، 3: 153-166.
دبیرمقدم، م. 1393. رده‌شناسی زبان‌های ایرانی، تهران: سمت.
دیانتی، م؛ رضائی، ح. و رفیعی، ع. 1399. «واژه‌های مرکب درون‌مرکز زبان فارسی: ساخت‌های مفهومی ساده یا پیچیده؟». جستارهای زبانی، 11 (6):  35 -68.
سبزواری، م. 1397. «بررسی معنی‌سازی و استنباط و الگوهای مفهومی اسم‌های مرکب درون‌مرکز فارسی». زبان‌پژوهی، 10 (27):  49 -68.
شقاقی، و. 1389. مبانی صرف. تهران: سمت.
شهسواری، ف. 1394. واج، تکواژ و واژه در زبان لکی. کرمانشاه: طاق‌بستان.
طباطبایی، ع. 1394. ترکیب در زبان فارسی: بررسی ساختاری واژه­های مرکب. تهران: آثار.
عاصی، م. و بدخشان، ا. 1389. «رد‌ه‌بندی واژه‌های مرکب». فصلنامۀ زبان و ادب فارسی، 46: 71-94.
عزیزی، ز. 1394. بررسی فرایندهای واژه‌سازی در گویش لکی بر اساس نظریۀ زایشی. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه کردستان.
غلامی، ب. 1395. فرهنگ باساک: ریشه‌شناسی واژگان زبان لکی. خرم‌آباد: پراکنده.
قطره، ف. و قندهاری، م. 1395. «بررسی اسم‌های دارای ساختار «اسم1 (و) اسم2» در زبان فارسی براساس نظریۀ آمیزش مفهومی». مجموعه مقالات چهارمین همایش ملی صرف، تهران: نشر نویسة پارسی: 171-190.
کریمی‌دوستان، غ. و وحید، ا. 1392. «تحلیل معنایی کلمات مرکب اسم-اسم در فارسی». پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی، 5 (8): 65- 82.
کیانی کولیوند، ک. 1390. فرهنگ و واژه‌نامۀ لکی (فرهنگ کیان)، خرم‌آباد: سیفا.
ملکی، م. 1392. «کلمات مرکّب راجی براساس طبقه‌بندی بیستو و اسکالیس». مطالعات زبان و گویش‌های غرب ایران، 1(1): 129- 154.
یاراحمدزهی، ن. 1388. اسامی و صفات مرکب درون‌مرکز و برون‌مرکز در فارسی. زبان‌شناسی، 44: 75- 86.
Adams, V. 1973. An introduction to modern English word formation. London: Longman.
Adams, V. 2001. Complex words in English. Harlow: Pearson.
Appah, C.K.I. 2016. Noun-adjective compounds in akan. Lingue e linguaggio, XV(2): 259-284.
Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. 2011. What is Morphology? (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bauer, L. 1983. English Word formation. New York:  Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, L. 2017. Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benczes, R. 2006. Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bisetto, A. & Scalise, S. 2005. The Classification of Compounds. Lingue E Linguaggio, 4(2): 319-332.
Costello, F, J., & Keane, M. T. 2000. Efficient creativity: constraint-guided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24 (2): 229-349.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language, Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katamba, F., & Stonham, J. 2006. Morphology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Levi, J. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic.
Ryder, M. E. 1994. Ordered chaos: the interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Szubert, A. 2012. Zurinternen Semantik der substantivischen Kompositaim Dänischen. Poznań: Wydanictwo Naukowe.