The event structure of prefixal verbs in Kurmanji Kurdish of Gilan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master in General Linguistics, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of General Linguistics, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

This paper investigates the event structure of prefixal verbs in Kurmanji Kurdish of Rudbar (located in the south of Gilan province) and discusses the interpretational contribution of derivational prefixes to the event structure of these prefixal verbs. The research data has been gathered by means of interviewing a number of native speakers in the region and the oral fulfillment of a questionnaire. The findings show that derivational prefixes mostly denote a directional concept and make a motion verb. As a consequence, a punctual interpretation is typically developed in their instances, unless the linguistic or situational context triggers an accomplishment (i.e. telic and durative) event type. In the data corpus of this research, only a few stative verbs were found, and we could detect no prefixal verb in the activity event type. Therefore, the prefixal verbs of the Kurmanji of Gilan can exclusively express the three event types of state, achievement and accomplishment in their various meanings. These observations (the dominance of punctual interpretation and the absence of activity events) are probably in line with the typical meaning of prefixal verbs, i.e. the directional movement.
 
Extended abstract
1. Introduction
This paper examines prefixal verbs in Kurmanji Kurdish of Gilan and attempts to determine the meaning of derived prefixes in these verbs in the framework of the features investigated in event structure studies. In other words, the main problem of the research is the role of these prefixes in determining the event type and how this event type interacts with other sentential elements (especially direct and indirect objects and adverbs). Prefixal verbs in Iranian languages ​​are the result of combining derivational prefixes with simple verbs. Kurmanji belongs to the northern sub-branch of Kurdish, and the Kurmanji Kurds of Southern Gilan settled down in the mountainous areas of this region as a result of two consequent movements at the time of the Safavid king Shah-Abbas and the Afshari king Nader-Shah.
 
2. Theoretical framework
Vendler (1957; reprinted 1967) classifies verbs based on time schemes, or more linguistically speaking, according to the temporal characteristics of verbs. In his original framework, the distinctions are made among the verbs in terms of characteristics such as being stative or process, bounded or unbounded, and durative or punctual. However, these differences cannot be explained in terms of the concept of time exclusively, and other factors like the presence or absence of objects, conditions of occurrence, and situation influence the event type. In general, based on the characteristic of (a)telicity and also its duration (the ability to extend the event on the time axis), the event types can be classified in four groups: state, activity, accomplishment and achievement.
 
3. Methodology
The data collection method of this research was a combination of library methods and fieldwork. First, by examining the grammars and available sources on different varieties of Kurmanji Kurdish, a list of prefixal verbs of these varieties was extracted, and based on this list, a questionnaire including 220 sentences was designed. Then, the Kurdish prefixal verbs of Kurmanji of Gilan were collected and recorded through interviews with native speakers of the Rudbar region. Most of the interviews were conducted with five speakers (one woman and four men), all of whom were born and lived in the village of Sibon (Khorgam district, Rudbar city, south of Gilan province) and their education ranged from primary school to associate degree. In the interview sessions, the speakers were asked to produce the questionnaire sentences in their own variety. If the speakers did not use prefixal verbs while translating the sentences, they were asked whether the prefixal verb in question (common in one of the Kurmanji varieties) is used in the Gilan variety, and their judgments were recorded. In total, the data corpus of this research amounts to 22 hours of recorded data from five main speakers and a number of others.
 
4. Results & discussion
In the data corpus of this research (the Kurmanji Kurdish of Gilan), at least 7 derivational prefixes were found which combined with the simple verbs, including væ-, hel-, ra-, ti-, ru-, li- and dæ-/de-/da-. Altogether, 20 prefixal verbs are made with these prefixes, including væ-gærin (‘to go back’), væ-gæranden (‘to return [something]’), væ-šarten (‘to hide’), væ-ræšin (‘to vomit’), væ-ǰæneqin (‘to fit’), hel-anin (‘to pick up’), hel-keren (‘to uproot’), hel-čenin (‘to collect’), hel-dayin (‘to lift’), hel-ferin (‘to jump out [of sleep]’), ra-kæten (‘to sleep’), ra-buyin (‘to stand up’), ti-kæten (‘to fall into’), ti-keren (‘to put in’), ru-nešten (‘to sit’), li-xesten (‘to hit’), da-keren (‘to bring down’), da-kæten (‘to get off’), de-xesten (‘to pull down’), væ-dæ-xesten (‘to take out’).
These verbs can be classified in three event types of stative, accomplishment, and achievement, and we could not detect any example of activity verbs among these prefixal verbs. As exemplified in the paper, either the prefix is responsible for the development of the event type, or the simple verb, or other sentential or situational elements. For example, if the direct object is an incremental theme, the resulted event will be an accomplishment. Furthermore, if the pragmatic nature of the object requires some time to be undergone by the action, this will also lead to the formation of an accomplishment.
 
5. Conclusions & suggestions
Out of the seven derivational prefixes which were introduced, five of them have directional meaning, at least in some of their meanings: væ- (back), hel- (upward), ra- (up/forward), ti- (in) and dæ-/de-/da- (downwards). In these examples, an achievement is usually developed, unless the linguistic or situational context motivates an accomplishment interpretation. Therefore, the achievement interpretation is the most dominant event interpretation for the prefixal verbs under investigation. The reason for this dominance is probably the nature of moving in a specified direction, which requires spending physical energy and occurs in the shortest possible time. The absence of activities in prefixal verbs can also be related to this explanation. On the other hand, in some of the meanings of the above-mentioned five directional prefixes, as well as in the examples of the prefixes ru- and li-, apparently a stronger semantic link has been established between the prefix and the verbal element, and in fact, a higher degree of lexicalization has occurred in the entire prefixal verb. As a result, in these examples, the semantic contribution of the prefix and the verbal element cannot be separated, and the contribution of the prefix to the event interpretation cannot be determined either.
 
Select bibliography
Bahrami-Khorshid, S. & A. Namdari. 2019. “The study of prefixed verbs in Persian within the framework of construction morphology”. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 7(25): 35-55. [In Persian].
Cheraqi, Z. & Gh. H. Karimi-Doostan, 2014. “Classification of Persian verbs based on Event and Aspectual”. Research in Linguistics, 4(2): 41-60. [In Persian]
Gündoğdu, S. 2015. “Noun-verb complex predicates in Kurmanji Kurdish: A syntactic account”, Proceedings of ConSole XXIII, 279-301.
Mehrbakhsh, I. 2014. A study of morphology, syntax and semantics of complex verbs in Kurmanji Kurdish. M.A thesis in Linguistics, Payame Noor University.
Mofidi, R. 2011. Event structure and its determinants in Persian. PhD Thesis in linguistics, Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian] 
Mofidi, R. 2017. “The transitive-intransitive distinction for Persian simple verbs from an event structure perspective”. In M. R. Razavi & M. Sanaati (eds.), Essays in linguistics: A festschrift for Mohammad Dabir-Moghaddam, 315-345. Tehran: Ketab-e Bahar. [In Persian].
Rothstein, S. D. 2004. Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical events. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.
Vendler, Z. 1957. “Verbs and times”. The Philosophical Review, 66: 143-60. Reprinted in: 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Zamani Siboni, I. 2021. The event structure of prefixal verbs in Kurmanji Kurdish of Roudbar, MA thesis in linguistics, Imam Khomeini International University. [In Persian].
Zarei, S. 2018. The study of compounds and prefix verbs of Kurdish language (Kalhori dialect), relying on contemporary literary works, MA thesis in linguistics, Ilam University. [In Persian]. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


ابوالحسنی چیمه، ز. 1390. «انواع نمود واژگانی در افعال فارسی»، ادب فارسی، 193: 101-120.
احسانی، آ. ۱۳۸۴. مقایسه دستوری فارسی میانه با زبان کردی امارلویی گیلان، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد فرهنگ و زبان‌‌های باستانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
ارانسکی، ی. م. ۱۳۷۸. زبان‌‌های ایرانی، ترجمۀ ع. صادقی، تهران: سخن.
اسماعیلی، م. م. 1390. گنجینۀ گویش‌های ایرانی (استان اصفهان1)، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
برجیان، ح. 1394. گنجینۀ گویش‌های ایرانی (استان اصفهان2)، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
بهرامی خورشید، س. و ا. نامداری. 1398. «بررسی افعال پیشوندی در زبان فارسی از منظر صرف ساخت»، زبان­ها و گویش­های غرب ایران، 7 (25): 35-55.
توحدی، ک. ۱۳۷۰. حرکت تاریخی کرد به خراسان، مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسی.  
چراغی، ز. و غ. ح. کریمی دوستان. ۱۳۹۲. «طبقه‌بندی افعال زبان فارسی براساس ساخت رویدادی و نمودی»، پژوهش‌های زبانی، ۴ (2): ۴۱-۶۰.
رضایتی کیشه­خاله، م. و م. دیان. 1388. «فعل­های پیشوندی در آثار منثور فارسی از آغاز تا پایان قرن پنجم»، دستور، 5: 27-50.
رضایتی کیشه‌خاله، م. و م. اصغرزاده. ۱۳۹۵. «مقایسۀ گویش کرمانجی رودبار با گویش‌های کرمانجی خراسان»، زبان­شناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، ۱۴: ۵۱-۷۵.
رضایی، و. و ژ. مکارمی. 1400. «برهم­کنش فعل­های لحظه­ای و انواع نمود دستوری»، زبان‌پژوهی، 40: 199-225.
رنجبر، و. ۱۳۸۸. دستور زبان کردی (گویش کرمانشاهی)، تهران: هرمس.
زارعی، س. ۱۳۹۷. بررسی افعال مرکب و پیشوندی در زبان کردی (لهجه‌ کلهری) با تکیه بر آثار ادبی، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی، دانشگاه ایلام.
زمانی سیبنی، ا. 1400. ساخت رویداد افعال پیشوندی در کردی کرمانجی رودبار، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی، دانشگاه بین­المللی امام خمینی.
سبزعلیپور، جهاندوست. 1394. گنجینۀ گویش‌های ایرانی (تاتی خلخال)، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
شرفکندی، ع. 1369. فرهنگ کردی-فارسی، تهران: سروش.
شقاقی، و. 1386. مبانی صرف، تهران: سمت.
طاهری، ح. 1386. «بررسی تحلیلی و تاریخی فعل­های پیشوندی در زبان فارسی»، نشریة دانشکدة ادبیات دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، 21 (پیاپی 18): 113-135.
علی­یاری بابلقانی، سلمان. 1396. گنجینۀ گویش­های ایرانی (هفت گویش از حاشیۀ زاگرس)، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
کبودی، ف. ۱۳۹۰. بررسی ساختار فعل در گویش کردی کرمانشاهی، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی، دانشگاه رازی.
کلباسی، ا. ۱۳۸۶. وندهای اشتقاقی در لهجه‌ها و گویش‌های ایرانی و کاربرد آنها در واژه‌سازی، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
ماهوتیان، ش. 1378. دستورزبان فارسی از دیدگاه رده­شناسی، ترجمۀ م. سمائی، تهران: نشر مرکز.
مدرسی قوامی، گ. 1396. راهنمای آوانویسی و واج­نویسی زبان فارسی، تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
مرادی، م. ر. 1394. گنجینۀ گویش­های ایرانی (استان کرمانشاه)، تهران: فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
مردوخی، هـ. ۱۳۹۱. بررسی وندها و جایگاهشان در ساخت‌های واژگانی کردی سورانی، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی، دانشگاه کردستان.
مفیدی، ر. 1386. «تحول نظام واژه­بستی در فارسی میانه و نو»، دستور، 3: 133-152.
مفیدی، ر. ۱۳۹۰الف. ساخت رویداد و عوامل سازندۀ آن در زبان فارسی، پایان‌نامۀ دکتری زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
مفیدی، ر. ۱۳۹۰ب. «بودن و داشتن: دو فعل ایستای فارسی»، دستور، ۷: 58-89.
مفیدی، ر. ۱۳۹۶. «تمایز لازم-متعدی در فعل‌های سادۀ فارسی از منظر ساخت رویداد». در م. ر. رضوی و م. صناعتی (ویراستاران)، جشن‌نامۀ دکتر محمد دبیرمقدم (مجموعه مقالات زبان‌شناختی)، 315-345. تهران: کتاب بهار.
مفیدی، ر. و ز. ربانی. 1399. «تعامل خوانش ماضی نقلی با گونۀ رویداد افعال ساده در زبان فارسی»، پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی، 22: 201-216.
ملکیان، ک. ۱۳۹۲. ساختمان فعل در گویش کردی دینوری، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه رازی.
نجفیان، آ. ۱۳۹۱. زبان‌‌ها و گویش‌های خراسان، تهران: کتاب مرجع.
نغزگوی کهن، م. 1387. «از واژه­بست تا وند تصریفی: بررسی تحول تاریخی بعضی واژه­بست­های فارسی جدید»، دستور، 6: 77-99.
Arche, M. J. 2006. Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aronoff, M. & K. Fudeman. 2011. What is morphology, 2nd ed. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Arsenijević, B. 2007. “Slavic verb prefixes are resultative”. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler & G. Puskas (eds.), Tense, mood and aspect: Theoretical and descriptive issues, 197-213. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.
Fillip, H. 1999. Aspect, eventuality types and nominal reference. New York & London: Garland Publishing.
Folli, R., H. Harley & S. Karimi. 2005. “Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates”. Lingua, 115: 1365-1401.
Gündoğdu, S. 2015. “Noun-verb complex predicates in Kurmanji Kurdish: A syntactic account”, Proceedings of ConSole XXIII, 279-301.
Haig, G. L. J. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Haspelmath, M. & A. D. Sims. 2010. Understanding morphology, 2nd ed. UK: Hodder Education.
Husband, E. M. 2012 “Stages of individuals and the composition of states”. The Linguistic Review, 29(3): 375-395.
Karimi, S. 1997. “Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional?”, Lexicology, 3: 273-318.
Kempchinsky, P. & R. Slabakova. 2005. Aspetual Inquiries. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kiss, K. É. 2008. Event structure and the left periphery. Dordrecht: Springer.
MacDonald, J. E. 2008. The syntactic nature of inner aspect. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McCarus, E. N. 2009. “Kurdish”. In G. Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 587–633. London & New York: Routledge.
Mehrbakhsh, I. 1393[2014]. A study of morphology, syntax and semantics of complex verbs in Kurmanji Kurdish. M.A thesis in Linguistics, Payame Noor University.
Rothstein, S. D. 2004. Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical events. Cornwall: Blackwell Publishing.
Rothstein, S. 2012. “Another look at accomplishments and incrementality”. In V. Demonte & L. McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 60-102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slabakova, R. 2005. “Perfective prefixes: What they are, what flavors they come in, and how they are acquired?” In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 13: The South Carolina meeting, 324-341. Ann Arbor, US: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Telegdi, Z. 1955. “Beiträge zur historischen Grammatik des Neupersischen I. Über die Partikelkomposition im Neupersischen”. ALH, 5: 67-183.
Thackston, W. M. 2006. Kurmanji Kurdish: A reference guide with selected readings. New York: Renas Media.
Thompson, E. 2005. Time in natural language: Syntactic interfaces with semantics and discourse. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Travis, L. 2010. Inner Aspect: The articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer.
Truswell, R. (ed.). 2019. The Oxford handbook of event structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vendler, Z. 1957. “Verbs and times”. The Philosophical Review, 66: 143-60. Reprinted in: 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J. 1993. A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Windfuhr, G. L. 1979. Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Windfuhr, G. (ed.). 2009. The Iranian languages. London & New York: Routledge.
Yousef, S. 2018. Persian: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.
Zinova, Y. 2021. Russian verbal prefixation: A frame semantic analysis. Berlin: Language Science Press.