The Judeo-Persian letter of Dandān-Uiliq II

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Ancient Iranian languages and culture, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. student of Ancient Iranian languages and culture, University of Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This paper deals with a Judeo-Persian letter named Dandān-Uiliq II (henceforth DU II); which probably dates back to 9th century C.E. In addition to its content, DU II has some important linguistic features, often absent in Persian texts written in Arabic script. Among them the use of “kū” as a preposition and the ancient subjunctive mood can be mentioned. The present paper will present a translation of the letter in addition to a discussion of its ancient linguistic features with comparison to the Early New Persian texts (in Perso-Arabic script) and certain early Quran translations into Persian (especially Qur'an-e Quds). The linguistic features of this early Judeo-Persian letter will represent a definite stage where the language is changing from Middle Persian to New Persian (Dari). Since the evidences related to this stage is relatively rare in the extant texts of Persian, this letter can undoubtedly be used for a more understanding of the period of Persian language evolution. The given translation is not the same as the previous English and Chinese translations and reflects our understanding of its syntax and morphology.

 
1. Introduction
Iranian Jewish communities have not settled only in the borders of Iran today, but in neighboring countries.  Their works, including unwritten as well as written materials, are not only the best heritages of their presence but also the mirror of Iranian culture, language and daily matters. Their value in a time when the works and materials reflecting the Iranian culture are not so numerous, and especially regarding the language, when most of the works are written in Arabic or at least in an official form of the Persian not reflecting the local changes as well as the process of transmission of the Middle Persian to the Early New Persian becomes more understandable. In such an environment and in a multicultural district like the Taklamakan, two Judeo-Persian letters written by ink on the papers have been found till now. In addition to their information about the district in the 8th-9th century C.E., the letters show a kind of local dialect which in companion with other few documents from this period, can give the researchers of the Persian language, some samples showing how the Middle Persian have been transmitted to the Early New Persian.
In Dandān-Uiliq, the writer after greetings, starts to count the gifts and the materials he has sent or has given to some officials there. In the last part, he advises that they should behave in a friendly manner towards the daughter of Dihqan and also gives some reports on the war and peace in Kashgar with Tibetans. The letter is not complete and the end part has missed.
 
2. Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework of the present paper is based on the common method of the Judeo-Persian studies and Persian language and literature as well as the historical linguistics.
 
3. Methodology
In this paper, by discussing the previous works on DU II as well as other EJP related texts, the authors tried to find all the available researches, and then by processing the information, emended previous researches and in some cases, they have strengthened and expanded such information. It’s noteworthy that everywhere they have found some ambiguities, did their best to make them clear.
 
4. Results & Discussion
The Judeo-Persian letter of DU II represents some important linguistic features, often in the absence of Persian texts written in Arabic script, e.g. the use of kū as a preposition and the ancient subjunctive mood. The letter has been translated in this paper and its ancient linguistic features have been discussed with comparison to the Early New Persian texts (in Perso-Arabic script) and some early Qur'an translations into Persian (especially Qur'an-e Quds). These features represent language transmission from Middle Persian to New Persian (Dari). The given translation is not the same as the previous English and Chinese translations and reflects our understanding of its syntax and morphology.
 
5. Conclusions & Suggestions
The Judeo-Persian letter of DU II which is written approximately in the 9th century in the oasis of Dandān-Uiliq is the second letter of its kind and shows the historical, cultural, financial as well as the political and linguistic environment of the district at the time. From a linguistic point of view, the letter asserts the previous findings, however, it portrays some new features as well.
 
Select Bibliography
Boyce, Mary. 1975. A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian, and Parthian: Texts with Notes. Bibliothèque Pahlavi.
Dehxodā, A. 1998. Loqat Nāme. Tehrān: Dānešgāh-e Tehrān. [In Persian].
Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond. 2004. A Dictionary of Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian. Brepols.
Lazar, Ž. 2014. Šeklgiri-ye zabān-e Fārsi. (M. Bahreyni, Motarjem), Tehrān: našr-e Hermes. [In Persian]
Lurje, Pavel B. 2010. Personal Names in Sogdian Texts. ÖAW.
Paul, Ludwig. 2003. "Early Judaeo-Persian in a Historical Perspective The case of the prepositions be, u, pa(d), and the suffix rā." In Persian origions, Early Judaeo-Persian and Emergence of New Persian, Collected Papers of the Symposium, Gottingen 1999, edited by Ludwig Paul, 177-194. Harrassowitz.
Paul, Ludwig. 2013. A grammar of early Judaeo-Persian. Reichert Verlag.
Utas, Bo. 1968. "The Jewish-Persian Fragment from Dandān-Uiliq." Orientalia Suecana 17: 123-136.
Zhang, Zhan. 2016a. Between China and Tibet: A Documentary History of Khotan in the Late Eighth and Early Ninth Century. Harvard University (Doctoral dissertation).
Zhang, Zhan. 2016b. "The Silk Road: A New History with Documents." In The Silk Road: A New History with Documents, edited by Valerie Hansen, 381-382. Oxford University Press.
 

Keywords

References

کتاب‏مقدس
انوری، ح. 1382. فرهنگ بزرگ سخن، تهران: سخن.
بهار، م. 1391. سبک‌شناسی، تهران: امیرکبیر.
دهخدا، ع. 1377. لغت نامه، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
رضایی باغ بیدی، ح. 1385. «کهن­ترین متون فارسی به خطوط غیرعربی (عبری، سریانی و مانوی)»،  نامۀ فرهنگستان، 8 (30): 9- 31.
صادقی، ع. 1357. تکوین زبان فارسی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد ایران.
غنی، ن. 1388. بررسی چند متن کهن فارسی – یهودی، تهران: دانش ایران.
قریب، ب. 1374. فرهنگ سُغدی (سغدی- فارسی- انگلیسی)، تهران: فرهنگان.
گیندین، ت. 1397. «مقدمه‌ای بر فارسی‌یهودی»، در فارسیهود، تدوین ن پیرنظر، 45-60. تهران: پردیس دانش.
لازار، ژ. 1393. شکل‏گیری زبان فارسی، ترجمه م بحرینی، تهران: هرمس.
مکنزی، د ن. 1388. ف‍ره‍ن‍گ ک‍وچک زبان پ‍ه‍ل‍وی‌. ترجمۀ م م‍ی‍رف‍خ‍رایی، تهران: پ‍ژوه‍ش‍گ‍اه ع‍ل‍وم ان‍س‍ان‍ی و م‍طال‍ع‍ات ف‍ره‍ن‍گ‍ی.
نوروزی، ح. 1391. «ریشه‌شناسی چند لغت در ترجمه‌ای از عهد عتیق.» زبان­شناخت، 3 (6): 121 -153.
یاحقی، م، [تدوین]. 1389. فرهنگنامه قرآنی، جلد4. مشهد: آستان‌ قدس‌ رضوی.
Bailey, Harold Walter. 1979. Dictionary of Khotan Saka. Cambridge University Press.
Bartholomae, Christian. 1979. Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Walter de Gruyter.
Bo, Bi, and Nicholas Sims-Williams. 2010. "Sogdian Documents from Khotan, I: Four Economic Documents." Journal of the American Oriental Society 130 (4): 497-508.
Borjian, Habib. 2015. "Judeo-Iranian Languages." In Handbook of Jewish Languages, edited by Lily Kahn and Aaron D. Rubin, 234-296. Brill Academic Publishers.
Boyce, Mary. 1975. A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian, and Parthian: Texts with Notes. Bibliothèque Pahlavi.
Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb. Brill.
Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond. 2004. A Dictionary of Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian. Brepols.
Gignoux, Philippe. 1972. Glossaire des Inscriptions Pehlevies et Parthes. Vol. I (Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum. Supplementary Series). Lund Humphries.
Gignoux, Philippe. 1986. Noms propres sassanides en moyen-perse épigraphique. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Haim, Ofir. 2012. "An Early Judeo-Persian Letter sent from Ghazna to Bāmiyān (Ms. Heb. 4°8333.29)." Bulletin of the Asia Institute 26 : 103-119.
Hansen, Valerie. 2012. The Silk Road: A New History. Oxford University Press.
Henning, Walter Bruno. 1957. "The Inscriptions of Tang-i Azao." Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 20 (1/3): 335-342.
Jastrow, Marcus. 1903. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. Luzac.
Kent, Roland Grubb. 1950. Old Persian: Grammar, Texts, Lexicon. American Oriental Society.
Koehler, Ludwig, Walter Baumgartner, and Johann Jakob Stamm, . 2000. Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (HALOT). Vol. V (Aramaic + Supplementary Bibliography). Brill.
Leslie, Donald D. 2010. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kaifeng. December 15. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kaifeng.
Lurje, Pavel B. 2010. Personal Names in Sogdian Texts. ÖAW.
Margoliouth, David Samuel. 1981. "The Judaeo-Persian document from Dandān-Uiliq." In Ancient Khotan, by Aurel Stein, 570-574.
Moriyasu, Takao. 2004. Die Geschichte des uigurischen Manichäismus an der Seidenstrasse: Forschungen zu manichäischen Quellen und ihrem geschichtlichen Hintergrund. Translated by Christian Steineck. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.
Müller, Friedrich Wilhelm Karl. 1912. Ein doppelblatt aus einem manichäischen Hymnenbuch (Mahrnâmag). Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Orsatti, Paola. 2019. "Persian Language in Arabic Script: The Formation of the Orthographic Standard and the Different Graphic Traditions of Iran in the First Centuries of the Islamic Era." In Creating Standards: Interactions with Arabic script in 12 manuscript cultures, edited by Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori and Lameen Souag, 39-72. (Eds.), (pp. De Gruyter.
Paul, Ludwig. 2003. "Early Judaeo-Persian in a Historical Perspective The case of the prepositions be, u, pa(d), and the suffix rā." In Persian origions, Early Judaeo-Persian and Emergence of New Persian, Collected Papers of the Symposium, Gottingen 1999, edited by Ludwig Paul, 177-194. Harrassowitz.
Paul, Ludwig. 2003. 2013. A grammar of early Judaeo-Persian. Reichert Verlag.
Porten, Bezalel, and Ada Yardeni. 1989. Textbook of Aramaic Documents from Ancient Egypt. Vol. II. IV vols. The Hebrew University.
Proverbio, Delio Vania. 2017. "On the phonetic unpredictability denoted by some Old Turkic texts written in Syriac script. Or the encoding ambiguity intrinsic to the Aramaic writing." Turkic Languages (Harrassowitz) 21 (1): 115-151.
Qing, Duan, and Helen Wang. 2013. "Were Textiles used as Money in Khotan in the Seventh and Eighth Centuries?" Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 23 (2): 307-325.
Rault, Lucie. 2018. L’Hymnaire manichéen chinois Xiabuzan 下部讚 à l’usage des Auditeurs un manuscrit trouvé à Dunhuang, traduit, commenté et annoté (NHMS 94). Brill.
Robinson, James T. 2015. The Arabic Translation and Commentary of Yefet ben ‘Eli the Karaite on the Book of Joshua. Brill.
Shaked, Shaul. 2009. "Classification of Linguistic Features in Early Judeo-Persian Texts." In Exegisti Monumenta: Festschrift in Honour of Nicholas Sims-Williams, edited by Werner Sundermann, Almut Hintze and François de Blois, 449–461. Harrassowitz.
Shapira, Dan. 2004. "Manichaeans (Marmanaiia), Zoroastrians (Iazuqaiia), Jews, Christians and Other Heretics: A Study in the Redaction of Mandaic Texts." Le Muséon 117 (3-4): 243-280.
Sims-Williams, Nicholas. 1981. "The Sogdian Fragments of Leningrad." BSOAS 44: 231-240.
Sims-Williams, Nicholas. 1996. "From Babylon to China. Astrological and Epistolary Formulae across Two Millennia." In La Persia e l'Asia centrale da Alessandro al X secolo. Atti dei convegni lincei 127, 77-84. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.
Sims-Williams, Nicholas, and James Russell Hamilton. 1990. Documents Turco-Sogdiens du IXᵉ-Xᵉ Siecle de Touen-houang. School of Oriental and African Studies.
Skjærvø, Prods Oktor. 2002. Khotanese manuscripts from Chinese Turkestan in the British Library : a complete catalogue with texts and translations. British Library.
Tafażżolī, Aḥmad. 1995. "Iranian Proper Names in the Kitāb al-Qand fī ḍikr ʿUlamāʾ Samarqand, 1, Sogdian Proper Names." Nāme-ye Farhangestān I (3): 4-12.
Tavernier, Jan. 2007. Iranica in the Achaemenid Period (ca. 550-330 B.C.): Lexicon of Old Iranian Proper Names and Loanwords, Attested in Non-Iranian Texts. Peeters.
Utas, Bo. 1968. "The Jewish-Persian Fragment from Dandān-Uiliq." Orientalia Suecana 17: 123-136.
Weber, Dieter. 2004. "Minuscula Pahlavica (Pahlavi Notes)." (Bulletin of the Asia Institute) 18: 135-142.
Weisz, Tiberiu. 2006. The Kaifeng Stone Inscriptions: The Legacy of the Jewish Community in Ancient China. iUniverse.
Wexler, Paul. 2006. Jewish and Non-Jewish creators of "Jewish" languages : with special attention to Judaized Arabic, Chinese, German, Greek, Persian, Portuguese, Slavic (modern Hebrew/Yiddish), Spanish, and Karaite, and Semitic Hebrew/Ladino. Harrassowitz.
Wong, Fook-Kong, and Dalia Yasharpour. 2011. The Haggadah of the Kaifeng Jews of China. Brill.
Xin, Xu. 2010. "Tracing Judaism in China." Social Sciences in China 31 (1): 130-161.
Zhang, Zhan. 2016a. Between China and Tibet: A Documentary History of Khotan in the Late Eighth and Early Ninth Century. Harvard University (Doctoral dissertation).
Zhang, Zhan. 2016b. "The Silk Road: A New History with Documents." In The Silk Road: A New History with Documents, edited by Valerie Hansen, 381-382. Oxford University Press.
Залеман, Карл Германович. 1905. "По поводу еврейско-персидского отрывка из Хотана." Записки Восточного Отделения Императорского Русского Археологического Общества. Том шестнадцатый (Типография Императорской Академии Наук) 46-57.
Лившиц, Владимир Аронович. 2011. "Личные имена в хорезмийском языке." Вестник древней истории 4 (279): 156-166.
Лившиц, Владимир Аронович. 1962. Согдийские документы с горы Муг. Чтение, перевод, комментарий. Выпуск II (Юридические документы и письма). Чтение, перевод и комментраии. Издательство восточной литературы.
Расторгуева, Вера Сергеевна, and Джой Иосифовна Эдельман. 2007. Этимологический словарь иранских языков. Vols. 3: f-h. Восточная литература.
吉田, 豐. 2017. "コータンのユダヤ・ソグド商人？." Edited by 氣賀澤保規 and 土肥義和. 敦煌・吐魯番文書の世界とその時代 3: 263-285.
吉田, 豐. 1994. "ソグド文字で表記された漢字音." 東方學報 66: 271-380.
张湛, and 时光. 2009. "一件新发现犹太波斯语信札的断代与释读." 敦煌吐鲁番研究 (上海古籍出版社) 9: 71-100.
松井太, and 白玉冬. 2017. "英国图书馆藏“蕃汉语词对译”残片(Or.12380/3948)再考." 敦煌研究 3: 60-65.
Persian Language and Iranian Dialects
Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10
Serial 10
September 2020
Pages 169-196

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics