A corpus-based study of Persian intonation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor in Linguistics, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin.

2 M.A in general Linguistics, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin.

Abstract

 
Extended abstract 
  
1. Introduction
The present research is a corpus- based study on Persian intonation. Previous studies on Persian intonation have only focused on experimental data and to date few researches have been carried out on Persian intonational patterns as realized in natural spoken corpora. The aim of the present research is to evaluate the intonation patterns of Persian content and grammatical words in a natural spoken corpus. The content words included nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs, and the grammatical words included pronouns, prepositions and copular verbs. Earlier researches posit two types of pitch accent in Persian intonatioanl grammar: A bitonal pitch accent, namely L+H* that marks words with stress on a non-initial syllable, together with their enclitics, and a mono-tonal pitch accent, i.e., H* that describes mono-syllabic words or initial-stressed words. The question addressed in the present contribution is to what extent the intonational patterns assumed in the Persian intonation literature may be replicated in studies of Persian natural spoken corpora.   
 
2. Theoretical framework
This research is based on the Auto-segmental theory of intonation. The intonational structure under this theory is composed of a number of tonal events aligned with specific segmental landmarks. The most important tonal events are pitch accents and boundary tones. Pitch accents are associated with stressed syllables while boundary tones are aligned with the boundary of prosodic units. These tonal events are called tonal targets as they are linked with specific segmental landmarks in the speech signal. The auto-segmental theory of intonation posits six pitch accents namely H*، L*،L+H*، L*+H، H+L*، H*+L.Among these pitch accents, L* and H* are mono-tonal, while L+H*، L*+H، H+L*، H*+L are bitonal. A mono-tonal accent is one which is composed of either a single high (H*) or low (L*) tone. Bitonal accents, on the other hand, are compound tones made of a combination of a low and a high tone, irrespective of their order.  
 
3. Methodology
The Methodology of the research is descriptive. A number of Persian content words, including nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs, and grammatical words including pronouns, prepositions and copular verbs, were randomly selected from 104 utterances from FarsDat (Farsi spoken language database). All the utterances had been spoken by native speakers of Persian speaking the standard dialect of Tehrani Farsi. The target words, content and grammatical, were segmented from the acoustic signals of the utterances for further analysis. All acoustic parameters were measured using Praat software, version 5.2.12.
Measurements were made simultaneously on F0 contour and spectrograph. The F0 patterns of the target words were investigated to see whether they bear a pitch accent, and if they do, what kind of pitch accent they are most associated with. 
 
4. Results and discussion
The results suggested that while content words usually receive pitch accents, grammatical words are rarely produced with a pitch accent. The findings further suggested that the morpho-syntactic category of a given word is unable to affect its tonal pattern. The distribution of the pitch accent types H* and L*+H revealed that Persian words are most often produced with the L*+H accent type, irrespective of their lexical stress pattern, and that the H* is used in initial-stressed words only when the segmental condition for the realization of the L tone is not satisfied. It was also argued that the alignment of the H tone in L*+H accent is affected by the presence or absence of enclitics in a word: In words with an affixed enclitic, the H peak is delayed, and realized in the post-accented syllable, while in words with no enclitic pronoun, the peak is realized on the accented syllable with no delay.
 
5. Conclusion 
Overall, the findings of the present research indicated that all Persian words, irrespective of their stress pattern receive the bitonal pitch accent L*+H, and the pitch accent H*is realized on words with initial stress only when the phonological condition for the realization of the L tone is not met.
 

Keywords


  1. Abolhasani Zadeh, V. Bijankhan, M. and Gussenhoven, C. (2012). ‘The Persian pitch accent and its retention after focus. Lingua 122: 1380-1394.
  2. Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D. R., & Mennen, I. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 3–25.
  3. ــــــــــــــــــــــ. (2006). Tonal association and tonal alignment:  evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Language and     
  4. Atterer, M., & Ladd, D. R. (2004). On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of F0: evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics 32, 177-197.   
  5. Beckman, M. E. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255-310.
  6. Bijankhan, M. (2014). Phonetic system of the Persian language. Tehran: The Iranian Center for Research and Development in the Humanities. [In Persian].
  7. Bijankhan, M., & Abolhassani Zadeh, V. (2014). Peak delay in the prosodic structure of Persian enclitics. Research in Language, 3 (5), 51-69. [In Persian].
  8. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 4.3.01, Retrived from http://www.praat.org/.
  9. Eslami, M. (2006). Phonology: Analysis of Persian Intonation System. Tehran: The Iranian Center for Research and Development in the Humanities. [In Persian].
  10. Eslami, M. (2010). Stress in Persian. Processing Signals and Data, 1 (11), 2-12. [In Persian].
  11. Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge
  12. Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology, 2nd ed.,Cambridge: Cambridge University  Press.
  13. Mahjani, B. (2003). An instrumental study of prosodic features and intonation in Modern Farsi (Persian). MS thesis, retrieved from:http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/teaching/postgrad/mscslp/archive/dissertations/2002-3/behzad_mahjani.pdf
  14. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  15. Prieto, P. (2005). Stability effects in tonal clash contexts in Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 215-242.
  16. Prieto, P., & Torreira, F. (2007). The segmental anchoring hypothesis revisited: Syllable duration and speech rate effects on peak timing in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 473-500.
  17. Sadat-Tehrani, N. (2007). The Intonational Grammar of Persian. PhD thesis. University of  Manitoba.
  18. ــــــــــــــــــــــ. (2009). The alignment of L + H* pitch accents in Persian intonation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 39, 205-230.    
  19. ــــــــــــــــــــــ. (2011). The intonation patterns of interrogatives in Persian. Linguistic discovery, 9(1), 105-36.
  20. Sadeghi, V. (2015). Phrased Accent in Persian intonational phonology: A case study. Journal of Language Researches, 2 (5), 57-76.  
  21.  ــــــــــــــــــــــ. (2017). Word-level prominence in Persian: An experimental study. Language and Speech, 60: 4,571-596.
  22. Silverman, K., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1990). The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In J. Kingston, & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I. Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 72–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23.  Sluijter, A. M. C., and van Heuven, V. (1996a). Spectral tilt as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4), 2471–2485. DOI: 10.1121/1.417955       Speech 49: 421-450. DOI: 10.1177/00238309060490040101
  24. Taheri-Ardali, M. & Xu, Y. (2012). Phonetic Realization of Prosodic Focus in Persian. In:Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2012. (pp. 326 - 329): Shanghai.